A importância do debate sobre as concepções de Carl Schmitt em uma Democracia

Notas

1 MARQUARD, Odo. Skepsis und Zustimmung Philosophische Studien. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. Stuttgart, 1995, p.7.

2 SCHMITT, Carl. Gesetz und Urteil: Eine Untersuchung zum Problem der Rechtspraxis. Berlin: Verlag von Otto Liebmann, 1912, p. 71.

3 ZIZEK, Slavoj. Welcome to the desert of the real: Five essays on september 11 and related dates. London: Verso, 2002, p. 110.

4 SCHLINK, Bernhard. Why Carl Schmitt? 1996, Disponível em: <https://de.booksc.org/book/9555690/be09e7> Acesso em 20 de dezembro de 2021, p.438.

5MOUFFE, Chantal. The Return of the Political. London: Ed. Verso, 1993, p.120.

6 BOBBIO, Norberto. O Futuro da Democracia: Uma defesa das regras do jogo. São Paulo: Ed. Paz e Terra, 6ª Ed, 1997, p.19.

7 SCHMITT, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Traduzido por Ellen Kennedy. London: MIT Press. 2000, p.27.

8 Ibidem, p.34.

9 KELSEN, Hans. A Democracia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000, p.143.

10 VILLE, Jacques de. Constitucional Theory: Schmitt after Derrida. New York: Birkbeck Law Press, 2017, p.80.

11 SCHMITT, Carl. The Concept of the Political. London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, p.56/57.

12 MULLER, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. London: Yale University Press, 2003, p.37.

Fique sempre informado com o Jus! Receba gratuitamente as atualizações jurídicas em sua caixa de entrada. Inscreva-se agora e não perca as novidades diárias essenciais!

Inscrever

Os boletins são gratuitos. Não enviamos spam. Privacidade

13 Ibidem, p.47.

14 SCHLINK, Bernhard. Why Carl Schmitt? 1996, Disponível em: <https://de.booksc.org/book/9555690/be09e7> Acesso em 20 de dezembro de 2021, p.429.

15 _________________________________. Deutscher Bundestag. Das Konzept der “Formierten Gesellschaft“ nach Ludwig Erhard, 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/666920/2386572122a1e0a76f74191bac16107a/WD-1-016-19-pdf-data.pdf>. Acesso em 23 de dezembro de 2021, p.5.

16 Ibidem, p.5/6.

17 FISCHER, Karsten. Fakultät III der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2006. Disponível em: <https://www.gsi.uni-muenchen.de/personen/professoren/fischer/download/mkm.pdf>. Acesso em 23 de dezembro de 2021, p.144.

18 VRIES, Eric de. Discussion Alexandre Kojeve-Carl Schmitt Correspondence and Alexandre Kojeve, "Colonialism from a European Perspective". Carleton University. Disponível em: <https://vdoc.pub/download/kojeve-carl-schmitt-correspondence-kojeve-colonialism-from-a-european-perspective-1958-26au5mu787jg>. Acesso em 20 de Dezembro de 2021.

19 Ibidem, p.121.

20 SCHMITT, Carl. The Theory of the Partisan: A Commentary/Remark on the Concept of the Political (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1963). Estados Unidos: Michigan State University Press, 2004, p.65.

21 AGNOLI, Johannes. Die Transformation der Demokratie und andere Schriften zur Kritik der Politik. Berlin: Ça ira - Verlag, Freiburg, 1990, p. 48/50.

22 Ibidem, p.70.

23 Ibidem, p. 108.

24 Ibidem, p.66/67.

25 Ibidem, p.53/54.

26 Ibidem, p.216/217.

27 SCHMITT, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, p.xiv.

28 MARQUARD, Odo. Skepsis und Zustimmung Philosophische Studien. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. Stuttgart, 1995, p.7.

29 MULLER, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. London: Yale University Press, 2003, p.8.

Abstract: Carl Schmitt is considered by many as authoritarian and his views are often related to the extreme right. What this article intends to address is the relationship of his ideas to the moment experienced by the theorist.

Keywords: Carl Schmitt, authoritarianism, democracy.