NOTAS

1. RIGBY, Kenneth J. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Disponível em: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/louilr44&div=83&id=&page=>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2011.

2. EDWARDS, Harry T. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema. Disponível em: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hlr99&div=36&id=&page>=. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2011.

3. MNOOKIN, Robert, Alternative Dispute Resolution. Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series.Paper 232. Disponível em: <https://lsr.nellco.org/harvard_olin/232>. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2011.

4. ALMEIDA JÚNIOR, Jesualdo Eduardo de. Arbitragem: questões polêmicas. Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 7, n. 58, 1 ago. 2002. Disponível em: <https://jus.com.br/artigos/3183/arbitragem-questoes-polemicas>. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2011.

5. UNITED STATES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Disponível em: <https://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/lowcost/documents/adr.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2011.

6. UNITED STATES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Disponível em: <https://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/lowcost/documents/adr.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2011.

7. UNITED STATES. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Disponível em: <https://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/lowcost/documents/adr.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2011.

8. METZLOFF, Thomas. Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategies in Medical Malpractice. Disponível em: <https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/allr9&div=17&id=&page>=. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2011.

9. KENNEN, Estela. Advantages and disadvantages of ADR. Disponível em:<https://www.suite101.com/content/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-adr-a58925>. Acesso: 02 jun. 2011.

10. CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE. Alternative Dispute Resolution Practitioner’s Guide. Disponível em: <https://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacb895.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 jun. 2011.

11. CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE. Alternative Dispute Resolution Practitioner’s Guide. Disponível em: <https://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacb895.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 jun. 2011.

12. HOGEMANN, Edna Raquel R. S.. A tutela jurisdicional diferenciada nos conflitos trabalhistas . Jus Navigandi, Teresina, ano 7, n. 54, 1 fev. 2002. Disponível em: <https://jus.com.br/artigos/2580/a-tutela-jurisdicional-diferenciada-nos-conflitos-trabalhistas>. Acesso em: 24 jun. 2011.

13. CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE. Alternative Dispute Resolution Practitioner Guide. Disponível em: <https://www.usaid.gov/our_work/democracy_and_governance/publications/pdfs/pnacb895.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 jun. 2011.

14. MAZIROW, Arthur. The advantages and disadvantages of arbitration as compared to litigation. Disponível em: <https://www.cre.org/images/MY08/presentations/The_Advantages_And_Disadvantages_of_Arbitration_As_Compared_to_Litigation_2_Mazirow.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2011.

15. NEWALL, Jeff. The Resolution of Interest Disputes by Final Offer Arbitration. Management Research News, v. 11, 1988, p.35 a 37.

16. BRASIL. Lei nº 10.101, de 19 de dezembro de 2000. Dispõe sobre a participação dos trabalhadores nos lucros e nos resultados das empresas e dá outras providências. Disponível em: <https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L10101.htm>. Acesso em: 05 jun. 2011.

17. BLACKMAN, John. Neutral Evaluation. An Adr technique whose time has come. Disponível em: <https://library.findlaw.com/1999/Sep/1/128447.html>. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2011.

18. GALLINS, Glenn. The Settlement conference. Disponível em: <https://www.thelawcentre.ca/self_help/small_claims_factsheets/fact_12>. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2011.

19. BOK, Derek apud ANDRIGHI, Fátima Nancy. Formas Alternativas de Solução de Conflitos. Disponível em: <https://bdjur.stj.gov.br/xmlui/handle/2011/587>. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2011.